This article is a work in progress.

We are supported in this work by an advisory group comprising predominantly people with lived experience of disability. You will see some of their experience reflected on this page. We are in the process of seeking a broader range of experiences reflecting more of the diversity of disability in Australia.

Mapping public thinking to shift culture on disability in Australia

Changing attitudes towards disability is a crucial driver of meaningful and sustained change towards a truly inclusive society.

Despite calls for change and efforts by many to better understand what people think about disability, harmful attitudes endure in Australia.

To change the status quo, we need to dig deeper and interrogate how Australians currently think about disability.

“Compelling work in other areas suggests that the key to developing effective attitude change at scale is to identify how people think rather than what they think.”

By focusing on the how we can better identify obstacles preventing Australians from thinking about disability in a holistic and inclusive way.

What are we doing to change community attitudes?

The Achieve Foundation has partnered with the FrameWorks Institute to develop an evidence-based approach to creating change that counters ableist attitudes that remain dominant in Australian culture.

What is abelism?

Ableism is a way of thinking or behaving, intentionally or otherwise, that discriminates against or systemically oppresses people with disabilities.

Ableism might look like:

  • Believing that people with disabilities have fewer valuable contributions to make to the world, than those without disabilities.

  • Telling a person they don’t look disabled as a compliment.

  • Refusing to respect the person with disability’s preferred descriptors such as “Deaf” vs “deaf person”, “person that uses a mobility aid” or using “Autistic person” rather than “person with Autism”.

  • Assuming someone can ‘overcome’ their disability if they just try hard enough.

The FrameWorks Institute is a global leader in using communications as a driver for social change. They have pioneered a research methodology to study public mindsets and the strategies that shift them. This approach to reframing has been driving change at scale on multiple issues in countries around the world for 25 years.

What is reframing?

Reframing is about changing the way we communicate about an issue to change the way that people think and talk. This usually involves engaging in a framing context as there are always more than one frame at play on a given social issue.

Source - FrameWorks Institute

Reframing an issue can change both how people think and act. Reframing messages and advancing new narratives is a vital part of creating a more inclusive society for people with disability.

The purpose of this project is to conduct research and implement new framing and communication strategies across Australia through workplaces and local communities to, over time, create a deep and sustained shift in Australian culture.

Together we are committed to close consultation with the disability community and have engaged leaders and change makers in this sector to partner and work alongside us in this endeavour.

This project has three phases. In the first phase, we have pulled together the key ideas that those in the disability community want to see change and have deeply examined the cultural mindsets that shape how Australians think about disability and inclusion. These can be thought of as point A (where we are today) and point B (our goal).

The findings from this first phase will be used to develop a suite of framing and communication strategies that can be used to bring about more inclusive mindsets towards disability in the community.

Findings from the first phase

This summary article presents themes that emerged from in-depth interviews undertaken with a diverse group of Australians. This included people with disability, and members of the public across a broad range of demographics.

The core findings from these interviews were tested and substantiated by disability experts and leaders in Australia.

Findings show clearly that harmful ways of thinking about disability persist among Australian communities and block efforts to create a more inclusive society.

This brings into sharp focus the need to shift these patterns of thinking and begins to suggest specific strategies that can be used to do so.

Leaders and change makers in the disability community

The Achieve Foundation upholds that people with disability must be at the forefront of all work that relates to disability. It has been of critical importance to us to engage people with disability as partners and we have built this project together.

We firmly endorse the expertise of leaders and change makers throughout the Australian disability community. As such, members of this community have been involved in the design and review of the research through at-length conversations, consultations, and participation in an advisory panel.

The expertise and knowledge these individuals bring to the table has been instrumental to our methodology in developing this project and will continue to be central as we move forward.

How are we going about our work? 

The project has three distinct phases. This summary article presents findings from phase one (Discovery) and analyses Australians’ current thinking about disability to reveal ways that we can begin to shift it.  

Having established a foundational understanding of mindsets about disability, the themes presented here will inform phase two of the project (Development and Testing), which involves developing and testing a toolkit of framing and narrative strategies that can be used by a wide range of messengers to shift public thinking about disability. During phase three (Implementation and Evaluation), we will implement these strategies through a range of tools and evaluate their impact on how Australians think and act on disability issues.  

We are aiming to complete phase two by late 2024.

Phase 1

Discovery

The discovery phase comprised of two parts:

Stage 1. Where are we going?

We worked in close consultation with disability experts and the literature from the sector to determine the core ideas that we want to shift thinking towards.

Stage 2. Where are we now?

We conducted in-depth interviews with the Australian public to determine what mindsets underpin how people think about disability in Australia today. We designed these interviews and reviewed findings with disability leaders in Australia.

Phase 2

Framing and communication strategies - development and testing

Phase 1 findings will form the basis of development and testing of framing and communication strategies. These will be tested through a range of methods (such as experimental surveys and on-the-street interviews) to determine their effectiveness in shifting people’s thinking about disability.

Phase 3

Implementation and evaluation

After development and testing, the suite of tools and communication strategies will be rolled out to the Australian public through various channels including public and private sector partnerships. We will monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of the communication strategies in changing attitudes and behaviours at scale.

Project methodology: How we conducted our research

We conducted interviews

We collected 600 hours of discourse through thirty in-depth interviews with members of the Australian public. This helped us understand not just what Australians think about disability, but how they think. These interviews used a flexible script and open-ended questions, designed to draw out open dialogue with the participants.

The methodology used in this research has been tested internationally for over two decades. The sample size of 30 participants that represent diversity across a number of demographic groups ensure that we are finding patterns of thinking that are shared across Australian culture. In projects of this nature, 30 interviews, yielding 600 hours of discourse, are enough to reach a saturation point where additional data provide no new insights into the cultural models of disability and inclusion in Australia.

D’Andrade, R. “Some Methods for Studying Cultural Cognitive Structures,” in Finding Culture in Talk: A Collection of Methods, ed. Quinn, N. 2006: 99-100); Kendall-Taylor, N. 2012. “Conflicting Mindsets of Mind: Mapping the Gaps Between Expert and Public Understandings of Child Mental Health. Science Communication, 34 (6): 701.

We analysed the interviews

Once conducted, we analysed the 600 hours of interview data to derive key themes and insights.

We evaluated findings with leaders in the disability community

Once we had extracted key themes through our in-depth analysis, we consulted closely with our project advisory panel. Most members of this panel have lived experience of disability as well as being leaders in the Australian disability community.

We also individually reached out to experts with and without disability to have in-depth conversations about the findings.

We used feedback to develop insights

Using the feedback received from leaders with disability we arrived at a set of key insights that will be used as the foundation for project phases two and three.

If you’d like the full version of this article which includes the problematic mindsets, please enter your details below to gain access.


Acknowledgements

Writing: Patrick O’Shea, Belle Tukin, Jessica Horner.

Photography: Jessica Horner, Graham Horner.

Digital Production: Blend Creative, a socially inclusive design studio.